| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings
Situation: Normal
1111
   |
Posted - 2013.02.04 13:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Sol Weinstein wrote:Trying to solve the NPC Exploit problem and the issues it creates. Yes, I suppose it is my term. I'm sorry if it doesn't fit into your world. It's the term I use. You need to explain the term so that a discussion can actually have any meaning or purpose.
This.
Morrigan LeSante wrote:What problem is it you're (badly flailing at) trying to solve here, exactly?
And this.
None of your "solutions" have any real meaning if you cannot adequately explain the problem that it is attempting to address in the first place. |
Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings
Situation: Normal
1111
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 21:37:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sol Weinstein wrote:I will state... again... for those that couldn't find the gumption to read the entire post... This has nothing to do with war, war decs, war targets, 'waaah you won't undock', 'waaah station games', or anything remotely concerning shooting at other players. Don't let the corp name confuse you.
And I will state...again...as others have, that you do a completely **** job of laying out your arguments as to WHY these things are problems. Hence your proposed "fixes" are without base or merit.
Try again.
As an example, you state in your OP
Quote:There are many aspects of this game that are ruined, just ruined, by actions of players in NPC corporations. The bounty thing is one of the major ones.
Just saying it doesn't make it so. You fail to put forth any convincing argument to back up that statement?
How does a player in an NPC corp ruin bounties? As far as I am aware while you cannot put a bounty on an NPC corp, you can put a bounty on a player in an NPC corp.
If a player in an NPC corp is suicide ganked, why shouldn't he be allowed to place a bounty on his attacker for revenge?
|
Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings
Situation: Normal
1112
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 03:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sol Weinstein wrote:You will be given the same instructions as the other people: please read all the posts in this thread on all the pages.
I gave my reasons and I suggest you give the thread and posters the respect of reading them.
Thank you.
Not too far up the thread you said you updated the OP. Now I have to read through the entire 9 pages, hoping to not miss some small piece?
The fact that you maybe answered those questions 8 pages later is proof of your failure to outline your proposal (both it's justifications and fixes) in your original post.
Good luck however with your arguments. Happily given your inability to formulate anything in a concise manner couple with your overly arrogant attitude will pretty much ensure something this stupid will never get implemented.
|
| |
|